Vulnerability Note VU#109475
Microsoft Windows NT and 2000 Domain Name Servers allow non-authoritative RRs to be cached by default
Overview
Microsoft Domain Name Servers hosted on Windows NT or Windows 2000 Server systems run with permissive DNS cache defaults. This may allow unauthorized remote intruders to redirect sites that rely on the vulnerable DNS servers for legitimate information.
Description
The Domain Name System, (partially specified in RFC 1034, Domain Names - Concepts and Facilities,) is the network infrastructure which maps Internet addresses to human-readable labels (names), and vice-versa. Several implementations of the servers responsible for managing this mapping information have had a specific security vulnerability called "cache poisoning" which may lead to corruption of the DNS information (resource records, or RRs) being managed (see CA-1999-22 for more details). Cache poisoning occurs when malicious or misleading data received from a remote name server is saved (cached) by a gullible name server. This bad data is then made available to programs running on workstations that request the cached data through the client interface (resolver). (Sample programs needing such DNS information include web browsers and email servers). This can adversely affect the mapping between host names and IP addresses, among other things. Once this mapping has been changed, hosts looking for legitimate DNS responses from a corrupted server can be redirected to arbitrary sites. |
Impact
Once the cache poisoning occurs, hosts looking for legitimate DNS responses from a corrupted server can be redirected to arbitrary sites. Alternatively, the information returned can be garbage, leading to possible denial of DNS service. |
Solution
|
See Q241352 for the complete set of instructions for enabling cache protection for both Windows NT and Windows 2000 Server systems. |
Systems Affected (Learn More)
Vendor | Status | Date Notified | Date Updated |
---|---|---|---|
Microsoft Corporation | Affected | 23 Jul 2001 | 14 Sep 2001 |
CVSS Metrics (Learn More)
Group | Score | Vector |
---|---|---|
Base | N/A | N/A |
Temporal | N/A | N/A |
Environmental | N/A | N/A |
References
- http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-1997-22.html
- http://www.cert.org/incident_notes/IN-2001-11.html
- http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q241/3/52.ASP
- http://www.microsoft.com/WINDOWS2000/en/server/help/sag_DNS_pro_SecureCachePollutedNames.htm
- http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/regentry/46753.asp
- http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1034.txt
- http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1035.txt (STD 13)
- http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2065.txt
- http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2181.txt
- http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/dnsext-charter.html
Credit
The details of this issue have been discussed in several public forums:
- NANOG
- INCIDENTS@securityfocus.com
- SANS intrusions@incidents.org
Microsoft has several articles in its knowledgebase as well.
This document was written by Jeffrey S. Havrilla.
Other Information
- CVE IDs: Unknown
- Date Public: 22 Jun 2001
- Date First Published: 09 Aug 2001
- Date Last Updated: 06 Aug 2002
- Severity Metric: 11.55
- Document Revision: 62
Feedback
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us email.