SkipNavigation
US-CERT
American Flag
  Vulnerability
Notes
Database

Search Vulnerability Notes

Vulnerability Notes Help Information


 
 View Notes By
  Name

ID Number

CVE Name

Date Public

Date Published

Date Updated

Severity Metric



 Other Documents
  Technical Alerts

Technical Bulletins

Alerts

Security Tips

Vulnerability Note VU#853540

Cisco PIX fails to verify TCP checksum

Overview

Versions of Cisco PIX firewalls do not validate the checksum of transiting TCP packets. Attackers may be able to use this problem to create a sustained denial-of-service under certain conditions.

I. Description

Cisco PIX firewall systems are used to enforce site-specific network security policy. A problem related to a failure to validate the checksum information of TCP traffic by default may be used by remote, unauthenticated attackers to create a sustained denial-of-service against PIX-protected systems under certain conditions.

This condition may occur when TCP SYN packets with malformed TCP checksums and spoofed source addresses and port values are sent to systems behind affected PIX firewalls. Since the PIX does not validate the TCP checksum by default, it allows such packets through, creating an embryonic connection entry to track the connection attempt to the destination from the spoofed source address and port. The target of the attack would silently drop malformed TCP SYN packets without sending TCP RST packets back to the PIX to remove the embryonic connection entry. Legitimate attempts to connect to PIX-protected systems may then be blocked for up to two minutes per attack (assuming default embryonic connection timer settings).

Note this attack would not affect established TCP connections.

Exploit code has been made publicly available that may automate a sustained denial-of-service attack described above.

II. Impact

Valid TCP connection attempts originating from the spoofed source IP and source ports during a sustained attack may not be allowed through affected PIX firewalls.

III. Solution

Several workarounds are publicly described by Cisco:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2120/products_security_notice09186a008059a411.html
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-response-20051122-pix.shtml

Systems Affected

VendorStatusDate NotifiedDate Updated
Cisco Systems, Inc.Vulnerable30-Nov-2005

References

http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/6733
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-response-20051122-pix.shtml
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2120/products_security_notice09186a008059a411.html
http://www.ciac.org/ciac/bulletins/q-062.shtml
http://secunia.com/advisories/17670/
http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2005-November/038971.html
http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2005-November/038983.html

Credit

This document was written by Jeff S Havrilla.

Other Information

Date Public:2005-11-22
Date First Published:2005-11-23
Date Last Updated:2005-11-30
CERT Advisory: 
CVE-ID(s):CVE-2005-3774
NVD-ID(s):CVE-2005-3774
US-CERT Technical Alerts: 
Metric:4.59
Document Revision:12

If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us email.
 

 
Page Corner Image
Produced 2005 by US-CERT, a government organization
Disclaimers and copyright information
Get Adobe Reader Get Adobe Reader